Poem for our Time 08/14/2011
Louis MacNeice’s Autumn Journal is surely the poem for our times. Written during and after the Munich Crisis of 1938, it is a diary of the delights and torments of ordinary life lived out against the backdrop of encroaching crisis. It captures the flavour of public and privet life intermingling better than any poem I know. Every event seems magnified by the external terror. His dog disappears and he thinks: “This is the end of the old regime”. But then she turns up at the police station and he breathes again. He catches the lurid mood of the times – “Turn on the purple spotlight, pull out the Vox Humana,/Dig up somebody’s body in a cloakroom trunk”. So like our world. For people of his time, of course, the worst duly happened a year later: for us the jury of destiny is out. Does he have answers as well as a diagnosis? Yes, he does but you will have to read the poem. Add Comment Feds and Pigs 08/12/2011
There is an air of unreality about much of the discussion of the riots. The word “responsibility” is used a lot but in truth teenagers have never been big on responsibility: they don’t yet have any real stake in society so responsibility doesn’t come into it. You can’t compare young people with sober, settled middle-aged citizens. Young men have always created mayhem and enjoyed it. I despair when I hear these kids called the police “Feds”. They want to puff themselves up by imaging they’re in the tougher and to them more glamorous world of LA. It’s the old English cringe again. But then I remember the hippie ’60s when British kids called the police “the pigs”. They also got this from America. The generational divide was more extreme in America, the redneck v hippie conflict pretty vicious, but the term “pigs” was provocatively stupid and demeaning when applied to the British police. So we have been here before? No, you don’t step in the same stream twice. There have been periodic moral panics about young people since WW2: teddy boys in the ’50s, mods rockers in the ’60s, hippies in the mid ’60s, skinheads ’70s, punks late ’70s. It has always been associated with music: rock ‘n roll, soul, rock, punk and for decades now rap and hip hop. So nothing has changed? Wrong again. There is a clear escalation, as there has been in everything. Reality and its portrayal in film and the media have become more extreme, more violent, throughout this period. The only comparison is 1968 when it became very political and in France the regime almost fell. But what happened last week was the dispossesseds’ equivalent of the bankers’ short-termism: grab the kit and trash the joint. If there was nothing left tomorrow but a burnt out ruin, they wouldn’t care. But we care: the world is still worth building and nurturing. These spasms of nihilism have to be seen off. . Home to Roost 08/12/2011
For Christmas 2005 Selfridges ran a newspaper ad in the colour magazines featuring a tableau of black pimps and hos in sex kit bra and pants. The strapline read “Get you Christmas booty”. Selfridges weren’t the only ones. Gangsta rap was deemed to be chic at the time and so an upmarket store felt it could cash in on such glamour to sell their “booty”. Gangsta rap glorifies criminality and violence, often against women. It is, needless to say, hugely influential. I thought at the time that some appalling line had been crossed. If mainstream media and upper class department stores think gangsterism and prostitution are respectable and glamorous what do you expect young people to make of it? In Manchester this week Miss Selfridge, which began as the young fashion section of Selfridges, was torched by the mob. These Presaged a Riot 08/11/2011
The BBC website has usefully listed 10 factors contributing to the riots, with comments by criminologists: Welfare dependence; Social exclusion; Lack of fathers; Spending cuts; Weak policing; Racism; Gangsta rap and culture; Consumerism; Opportunism; Technology and social networking. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14483149 I’m sure that all ten do contribute which shows just what sort of a task it will be to dig ourselves out of the hole we have created. Just to make matters worse most people will have a few factors the BBC missed, starting with their so-called popular dramas. Switching on for the Ten O’Clock News we usually catch the tail-end of scenes of gratuitous depravity. One of the worst was repeated in the same slot: a black boy had been murdered by a gang; the camera zoomed in on his corpse – the face had been destroyed. Last week, the image of a woman, bound and gagged in a car which was tipped into a crusher. When the jaws had closed, the camera zoomed onto her eye still blinking in the middle of this impacted steel cube. This goes on every night and the BBC programme are probably not the worst. What possible justification could there be for inventing such voyeuristic squalor and terror? And, to rerun the ancient argument, if it doesn’t coarsen and brutalize people why run it at all? What sort of effect do they think it has on people? Are you supposed to watch thinking: that’s fun? Really good entertainment? Let’s have another beer? Dumbing Down 08/11/2011
You can tell by the style adopted by the rioters how influential the glamourisation of gangsterism has been. These kids who call the Police “Feds” aren’t living in London but in an episode of The Wire. The mainstream media is guilty of fostering this subculture whilst neglecting the true stuff that still exist. The two best 2 cultural events I’ve experienced lately, the Gary Burton Quartet at Ronnie Scott’s and Marcus du Sautoy’s The Code: Episode 2 - Shapes on BBC2 were hardly reviewed. Instead the culture pages remain obsessed with Beyonce and Jay-Z etc. Cargo Cult 08/11/2011
Re the riots: if you promote a cult of designer brands and an ethos of shop-till-you-drop to the exclusion of notions of work, good making and artistic expression you will die by them. The looters have no idea where this stuff comes from – they don’t see it as something to be invented, designed and made, it just flies in by ju-ju magic. The fact that the warehouse they burnt down in Enfield was Sony’s sole distribution point for the UK would be unknown to them. They know nothing of the world that builds and makes and sustains us. They would trash the entire world if they could and then sit there with a begging bowl saying that someone must feed them. Just as the US promoted globalization in its own selfish interest and has been bankrupted by it, crass consumerism has created a monster that is devouring it. I didn’t expect to enjoy Rome nearly as much as I did. I’d been once before and it rained incessantly, driving us from refuge to refuge (the Pantheon was a favourite, even though it rains through the hole in the roof). The Sistine was closed. But this time we stayed in Trastevere, Rome was instantly laid out before us, walkable, and the sun shone. Of course the set pieces were wonderful. Seeing the Sistine ceiling for the first time, I realised that the colours I so loved in Poussin – the apple green, sky blue, terracotta and orange – were of course, really Michelangelo's colours. This time around I have a real interest in the Roman world, not the rather baffled distant respect I had before. Having become interested in prehistory and human evolution, the Rome of 2000 years ago seems virtually yesterday. But what really struck home was the persistence of traditional Rome – the classic Roman cuisine of saltimbocco and osso buco – and its pleasant unthreatening version of international street life. Campo Fiori and Pizza Navona were the main hangouts. The buskers were excellent. Everyone knows the Great American Songbook but in Rome the Latin and Rock songbooks rule. Girl From Ipanema, Autumn Leaves, Besame Mucho were the standbys. There is also a great European Songbook: even if some of hails from South America, it’s the perfect music to hear in Roman streets. A really fine rock guitarist in Navona played Little Wing and Sultans of Swing with real fire and technique. But most striking of all was a street artist with a fabulously theatrical graffiti airbrush technique. People watched him for the theatre more than the results which were usually kitsch but sometimes transcended it. He worked very quickly, rotating his armoury of cans and stencils with hardly a moment's pause. Occasionally he flamed the picture, which was dramatic but had the unfortunate effect of giving the paint a sickly glossy patina which make kitsch unavoidable. His favourite subject was the Colosseum. He painted the planets by request and the joy lay in their eventual emergence from behind a veil of screens and stencils. From Roman grandeur, through Renaissance harmony, to the hip-swinging joy of Latin guitar music on the streets, it was possible to embrace all of this. The only really jarring note is Victor Emmanuel’s Palace. Enormously tall, overbearingly visible from everywhere, Fascist architecture avant la lettre, this building is wrong in every way. The Corinthian columns piled above ugly masses of stone; the appalling, meaningless decoration in place of standard neoclassical motifs – this seems to be the point where Italy started to go badly wrong. We heard a lot about that, of course, the four-point Referendum was a few days away and the national shame that is Berlusconi hung heavily over the city. But Rome makes a better fist of city life than most of the more touted contenders. It is smaller, more intimate; the bird life in Trastevere, with raucous gulls and air-dicing swifts and swallows, and the majestic plane trees along the Tiber, remind that rus in urbe is Latin. Inspirational. Guardian Books Podcast 05/14/2011
Just done a podcast for Guardian Books with Tim Radford. Tim's new book, The Address Book, is just out. We share many interests (especially Primo Levi, Darwin), having both working in both science and the arts and, well prompted by Claire Armitstead and Richard Lea, covered a fair territory in half an hour. Check it out. What on Earth? Wallbook 11/30/2010
Christopher Lloyd is a historian for the big picture, believing that history should now include our relationship with the natural and material worlds. Now, he's followed his large illustrated books What on Earth Happened? and What on Earth Evolved? with a Wallbook that opens out to tell the human story from the Big Bang to now. Cunningly arranged, with more information than you'd think possible in such a span, it's a great way of taking your bearings on how we got to this point. The text on the reverse of the chart also does a brilliant job of topic selection. It is particularly good on the emergence of our culture, picking up techniques along the way, especially domesticating crops and animals. The What on Earth? Wallbook is currently available at £15 from the What on Earth? website or call 01443 828811. Banksy, Picasso and Mimicry 08/18/2009
Banksy versus Bristol Museum is an obvious media and popular triumph but many seem to want to play down its artistic significance. The show is actually full of surprises and paints Banksy in a new light: the heir to a line that includes Picasso, Sir Ernst Gombrich and the study of mimicry in nature. How so? One room in the show contains pieces that Banksy could never have mounted on the street: animatronic creatures in caged installations. These include a rabbit surrounded by make up gear admiring herself in front of a mirror and a chimpanzee artist rocking his head, closing one eye after the other as he sizes up the conventional landscape he is painting. These make telling points about human vanity and they also show how easily an impression of life can be created by a few simple movements: if it twitches it must be alive. Then there is the animated processed food. Chicken nuggets hatched from eggs are feeding; a salami squirms as if to escape its plastic casing; a mustard-coated sausage in a hot dog sips water. But the most amazing of these living processed food sculptures is the salami in which the thread that tied it to a hanging string is draped to look like whiskers. The cartoon minimalism of this creature is stunning: a craning salami head and a wispy string and, hey presto, it is a walrus. But – the other stroke of genius – the tail of this writhing walrus/salami has already been diced and sliced several times. It is impossible to look at Banksy’s salami without thinking of the assemblages Picasso created around 1948-51. Foraging for suggestive junk around rubbish tips in Vallauris, he created a series of sculptures, including a Little Owl who struts on rusty screws for feet, a bull’s horns made from a bike handlebar, and a baboon’s head from two toy cars, placed wheel to wheel. Whether Banksy was thinking of Picasso’s assemblages when he created these living-food pieces I don’t know but he was certainly thinking of Picasso when he mounted the show. On a plaque inscription he quotes Picasso as saying that “Bad artists copy; great artists steal”, scratches out the attribution to Picasso, and substitutes his own name. There is no evidence Picasso ever said this, although one feels he ought to have. The authentic quote is from T. S. Eliot (“immature poets imitate; mature poets steal”) but in essence I’m sure that Eliot, Picasso and Banksy are at one on this. In one piece Banksy surpasses Picasso by using equipment unknown in the 1950s. The contemporary hi-tech equivalent of Picasso’s Little Owl is the CCTV family of a mother and two chicks. Perched on their poles over the motorways, CCTV cameras already look like storks; in the Banksy, a mother CCTV gazes down solicitously on her two tiny offspring. Her head roves back and forth over them; the agitated babies crane up to her, jiggling their beaks for food, as fledglings do. The wit and resonance of this piece – its punning on ideas of surveillance, protection, and maternal care v. Big Brother intrusion – is a triumph. Such punning visual suggestions were of deep interest to the art historian Sir Ernst Gombrich, who showed how a thread of visual punning ran through cartooning (Banksy is, much of the time, a cartoonist), and advertising, as well as fine art. He highlighted the punning of natural forms and human gestures, as in an 18th century French cartoon which saw the character of Louis Philippe’s face in a pear (a secondary meaning of “poire” in French is fathead, so the cartoon is both visually insulting, in emphasizing the flabby jowly features of the King and a verbal insult). Gombrich commented: “Thus a play on words and a visual joke were happily combined”. Gombrich also noted that nature has equivalents for artistic styles; leaf mimicry is naturalistic but a butterfly’s eyespots “represent, if you like, the Expressionist style of nature”, meaning that the eyespot is a symbolic warning gesture that doesn’t copy anything. For millions of years before Picasso and Banksy appeared on the scene, creatures have been masquerading as a different kind of thing entirely, either camouflaging themselves against the background like the peppered moth (pale and peppered against lichen in the country; black against soot in the city), or mimicking the form of a stone, a leaf or another creature, as the harmless kingsnakes do, donning the red, yellow and black banding of the toxic coral snakes. In his two-dimensional work Banksy is expert at pointing up the sad contradictions of human existence: the gross Western tourist couple, grinning inanely and self-admiringly into their camera phones as they are pulled in a rickshaw by a waif of an Asian boy; another waif, lost in a blasted wilderness, sporting an “I Don’t Like Mondays” T shirt. In Banksy’s “menagerie room” at Bristol, in three dimensions, he ranges across the world of animals/food and machines to show that our vaunted gestures are not so grand and that vitality and significant form reside in all creation. Picasso would be applauding and so, I think, would Darwin, who was the first to note the similarity between animal and human expressions. | AuthorI'm a writer and musician whose interests include the biological revolution happening now, the relationship between art and science, jazz, and the state of the planet ArchivesJanuary 2012 CategoriesAll |
RSS Feed